<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spiritual pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dmcleish.id.au/2007/03/11/spiritual-pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dmcleish.id.au/2007/03/11/spiritual-pornography/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on atheism and life from Sydney, Australia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:38:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.dmcleish.id.au/2007/03/11/spiritual-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordpress.dmcleish.id.au/?p=24#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I did a search on &quot;spiritual pornography&quot; hoping to find people having graphic x-rated union with god... Hmmm. No such luck!... ;-) ... Even so your comments are interesting. However it seems to me that your insight points to a different conclusion than the one you draw: that having discarded world-view A for world-view B, and then discarded world-view B in favour of world-view C, and then having discarded world-view C in favour of world-view D, a pattern is emerging. The reasonable conclusion is not world-view D, but rather the discarding of world-views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a search on &#8220;spiritual pornography&#8221; hoping to find people having graphic x-rated union with god&#8230; Hmmm. No such luck!&#8230; <img src='http://blog.dmcleish.id.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8230; Even so your comments are interesting. However it seems to me that your insight points to a different conclusion than the one you draw: that having discarded world-view A for world-view B, and then discarded world-view B in favour of world-view C, and then having discarded world-view C in favour of world-view D, a pattern is emerging. The reasonable conclusion is not world-view D, but rather the discarding of world-views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. L. Hanson</title>
		<link>http://blog.dmcleish.id.au/2007/03/11/spiritual-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>C. L. Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordpress.dmcleish.id.au/?p=24#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The same idea exists in Mormonism. You shouldn&#039;t read things that criticize the church because it&#039;s just a bunch of lies written by evil people under the influence of Satan. It&#039;s a forces of good vs. forces of evil sort of thing.

They don&#039;t use the term &quot;spiritual pornography&quot; though. They call it &quot;Anti-Mormon literature&quot; (or just &quot;Anti-Mormon&quot; if it&#039;s not in book or pamphlet form). That&#039;s probably why your google search turned up so much stuff about your (former) religion -- each group uses its own terminology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same idea exists in Mormonism. You shouldn&#8217;t read things that criticize the church because it&#8217;s just a bunch of lies written by evil people under the influence of Satan. It&#8217;s a forces of good vs. forces of evil sort of thing.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t use the term &#8220;spiritual pornography&#8221; though. They call it &#8220;Anti-Mormon literature&#8221; (or just &#8220;Anti-Mormon&#8221; if it&#8217;s not in book or pamphlet form). That&#8217;s probably why your google search turned up so much stuff about your (former) religion &#8212; each group uses its own terminology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

